Does your country live up to the Commonwealth’s 1991 Harare Declaration?

Posted by ZoeWare - 19/07/09 at 04:07 pm

Have you read the Commonwealth’s 1991 Harare Declaration, which defines the association’s fundamental political values. Does your country live up to them?

The 1991 Harare Declaration is one of the key documents that sets out the Commonwealth’s core, guiding principles. It commits all Commonwealth members to a path of democracy, good governance, human rights, gender equality and sustainable development.

How well do you think your government is doing at upholding these values? If it’s not doing well, what is going wrong? Read the Declaration below, and let us know what you think . . .

HARARE COMMONWEALTH DECLARATION 1991

Issued by Heads of Government in Harare, Zimbabwe on 20 October 1991

1. The Heads of Government of the countries of the Commonwealth, meeting in Harare, reaffirm their confidence in the Commonwealth as a voluntary association of sovereign independent states, each responsible for its own policies, consulting and co-operating in the interests of their peoples and in the promotion of international understanding and world peace.

2. Members of the Commonwealth include people of many different races and origins, encompass every state of economic development, and comprise a rich variety of cultures, traditions and institutions.

3. The special strength of the Commonwealth lies in the combination of the diversity of its members with their shared inheritance in language, culture and the rule of law. The Commonwealth way is to seek consensus through consultation and the sharing of experience. It is uniquely placed to serve as a model and as a catalyst for new forms of friendship and co-operation to all in the spirit of the Charter of the United Nations.

4. Its members also share a commitment to certain fundamental principles. These were set out in a Declaration of Commonwealth Principles agreed by our predecessors at their Meeting in Singapore in 1971. Those principles have stood the test of time, and we reaffirm our full and continuing commitment to them today. In particular, no less today than 20 years ago:

  • we believe that international peace and order, global economic development and the rule of international law are essential to the security and prosperity of mankind;
  • we believe in the liberty of the individual under the law, in equal rights for all citizens regardless of gender, race, colour, creed or political belief, and in the individual’s inalienable right to participate by means of free and democratic political processes in framing the society in which he or she lives;
  • we recognise racial prejudice and intolerance as a dangerous sickness and a threat to healthy development, and racial discrimination as an unmitigated evil;
  • we oppose all forms of racial oppression, and we are committed to the principles of human dignity and equality;
  • we recognise the importance and urgency of economic and social development to satisfy the basic needs and aspirations of the vast majority of the peoples of the world, and seek the progressive removal of the wide disparities in living standards amongst our members.

5. In Harare, our purpose has been to apply those principles in the contemporary situation as the Commonwealth prepares to face the challenges of the 1990s and beyond.

6. Internationally, the world is no longer locked in the iron grip of the Cold War. Totalitarianism is giving way to democracy and justice in many parts of the world. Decolonisation is largely complete. Significant changes are at last under way in South Africa. These changes, so desirable and heartening in themselves, present the world and the Commonwealth with new tasks and challenges.

7. In the last twenty years, several Commonwealth countries have made significant progress in economic and social development. There is increasing recognition that commitment to market principles and openness to international trade and investment can promote economic progress and improve living standards. Many Commonwealth countries are poor and face acute problems, including excessive population growth, crushing poverty, debt burdens and environmental degradation. More than half our member states are particularly vulnerable because of their very small societies.

8. Only sound and sustainable development can offer these millions the prospect of betterment. Achieving this will require a flow of public and private resources from the developed to the developing world, and domestic and international regimes conducive to the realisation of these goals. Development facilitates the task of tackling a range of problems which affect the whole global community such as environmental degradation, the problems of migration and refugees, the fight against communicable diseases, and drug production and trafficking.

9. Having reaffirmed the principles to which the Commonwealth is committed, and reviewed the problems and challenges which the world, and the Commonwealth as part of it, face, we pledge the Commonwealth and our countries to work with renewed vigour, concentrating especially in the following areas:

  • the protection and promotion of the fundamental political values of the Commonwealth:
    - democracy, democratic processes and institutions which reflect national circumstances, the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, just and honest government;
    - fundamental human rights, including equal rights and opportunities for all citizens regardless of race, colour, creed or political belief;
  • equality for women, so that they may exercise their full and equal rights;
  • provision of universal access to education for the population of our countries;
  • continuing action to bring about the end of apartheid and the establishment of a free, democratic, non-racial and prosperous South Africa;
  • the promotion of sustainable development and the alleviation of poverty in the countries of the Commonwealth through:
    - a stable international economic framework within which growth can be achieved;
    - sound economic management recognising the central role of the market economy;
    - effective population policies and programmes;
    - sound management of technological change;
  • the freest possible flow of multilateral trade on terms fair and equitable to all, taking account of the special requirements of developing countries;
  • an adequate flow of resources from the developed to developing countries, and action to alleviate the debt burdens of developing countries most in need;
  • the development of human resources, in particular through education, training, health, culture, sport and programmes for strengthening family and community support, paying special attention to the needs of women, youth and children;
  • effective and increasing programmes of bilateral and multilateral co-operation aimed at raising living standards;
  • extending the benefits of development within a framework of respect for human rights;
  • the protection of the environment through respect for the principles of sustainable development which we enunciated at Langkawi;
  • action to combat drug trafficking and abuse and communicable diseases;
  • help for small Commonwealth states in tackling their particular economic and security problems;
  • support of the United Nations and other international institutions in the world’s search for peace, disarmament and effective arms control; and in the promotion of international consensus on major global political, economic and social issues.

10. To give weight and effectiveness to our commitments we intend to focus and improve Commonwealth co-operation in these areas. This would include strengthening the capacity of the Commonwealth to respond to requests from members for assistance in entrenching the practices of democracy, accountable administration and the rule of law.

11. We call on all the intergovernmental institutions of the Commonwealth to seize the opportunities presented by these challenges. We pledge ourselves to assist them to develop programmes which harness our shared historical, professional, cultural and linguistic heritage and which complement the work of other international and regional organisations.

12. We invite the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and non-governmental Commonwealth organisations to play their full part in promoting these objectives, in a spirit of co-operation and mutual support.

13. In reaffirming the principles of the Commonwealth and in committing ourselves to pursue them in policy and action in response to the challenges of the 1990s, in areas where we believe that the Commonwealth has a distinctive contribution to offer, we the Heads of Government express our determination to renew and enhance the value and importance of the Commonwealth as an institution which can and should strengthen and enrich the lives not only of its own members and their peoples but also of the wider community of peoples of which they are a part.

Bookmark and Share

8 Responses to “Does your country live up to the Commonwealth’s 1991 Harare Declaration?”

  1. davidsonpanabokke says:
    July 25th, 2009 at 10:52 am

    My country Sri Lanka has been violating the Commonwealth principles from the time of independence(February 1948):

    1. Nearly a million Indian Tamil plantation workers brought to the country from South India by the British in mid-late nineteenth century were made stateless and voteless by:
    a.Citizenship Act. No. 18 of 1948
    b.Elections Amendment Act. No. 48 of 1949

    2. Government schemes to colonise Sinhalese increasingly aggressively in the Eastern Tamil region by successive governments that continues up to now ? the EU team visiting Sri Lanka in July 2008 was prevented from going to the Eastern region to hide the very frantic Sinhalisation carried out by the present government after driving Tamils from areas around Trincomalee(up to Batticaloa) away by bombing and shelling their villages.
    ?Homeguards? were created to protect the Sinhalese colonies created by driving out Tamil villagers over the last decades.

    3. Oppression in a. Livelihood ? i.employment in government services and ii.investment for economic development and b. Social services ? education, health and other social improvement services.

    4. Anti-Tamil pogroms instigated by politicians of the government in power:
    Major ones -1958, 1977, 1981 and 1983. A large number of minor ones including massacres of villages by state armed forces enjoying impunity. Nearly 80,000 Tamils have been fleeing Sri Lanka in the last five decades.

    5. Politicised judiciary disables Tamils from receiving justice. Curfews of 50s and 60s affected the Northeast, ie.Tamils, much more than the others. Emergency from 1971 and Prevention of Terrorism Act from 1979 have been affecting Tamils? freedom of movement and freedom of expression and the right to justice overwhelmingly.

    6. Periods of Economic Embargo(movement of essentials in and out of Northeast) affected the Tamils. Banning and severe restrictions of fishing over large periods affected Tamil fishermen. Taking over large areas of Northeast as ??High Security Zones?? pushed out farmers from their farmland for nearly two decades to camps all over Northeast.

    7. The massive foreign aid for tsunami wasn?t shared with the Tamils. This is continued into the way the hundreds of thousands of Tamil IDPs have been put behind barbed wire and heavily guarded by the Army and aid agencies have been given severely restricted access, but the army has set up shops selling food and water at exorbitant prices. Media are denied access but the aid agencies are also prevented from taking cameras and phones and from conversing with the IDPs ? here we?re conversing with the whole world.

    8. In the heavily militarised Northeast and Colombo in the last forty months of rule of this present regime ?
    Nearly 20 journalists have been murdered. Many more have been attacked and imprisoned for criticising the government.
    More than 40 aid workers have been murdered.
    More than 2,000 have been abduct-murdered. NO investigations leading to prosecution. UN reported that nearly 7,000 have been killed between January and April 2009.
    UN and ICRC have been prevented from going into the zone of the last battle where more than 20,000 might been killed in the last few weeks according to independent military analysts as reported in The Times(UK) of 29 May 2009.

    UN officials working in Sri Lanka have restrictions that are not applied by other countries.

    It is very much hoped that the reform spoken by Rt Hon David Miliband will reach all parts of the Commonwealth.

  2. mary2tony says:
    July 30th, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    ”…. support of the United Nations and other international institutions in the world?s search for peace ….”

    Philip Alston, Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, UNHRC Seventh session, 3 June 2008 : ””In 2005 I sounded the alarm. I said that Sri Lanka was on the verge of a major crisis and I indicated to the General Assembly how to avoid the crisis. But nothing was done. The Sri Lankan government did not try and discuss the recommendations with me and it has not made any serious effort to resolve human rights problems. It only acted in Geneva to avoid the Council taking any measures against it”.

  3. mary2tony says:
    July 30th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    ”action to combat drug trafficking”

    Sri Lanka:
    Jaffna peninsula has been cut off from the rest of the Northeast which itself has been cut off from the rest of the country. Jaffna peninsula has been highly militarised and a doctor who visited the peninsula told the audience at a meeting last year in London that the Army supplies drugs to young men and women. University teachers are unable to help the drug-addicted students.

  4. mary2tony says:
    July 30th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    ”help for small Commonwealth states in tackling their particular economic and security problems”

    Recent reports by international organisations have spoken about the impunity enjoyed by the Sri Lankan armed forces against any crimes committed against Tamils. Tamil citizens have no security from their own country.

  5. wajahat says:
    July 30th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    The issueat hand is not that of the Commonwealth countries living upto the Harare Declaration. The real issue is that most of the Commonwealth countries are poor and were not allowed sufficient space and time to develop themselves and had to inherit the problems from their rulers, once they gained independence. Therefore, the states under the Commonwealth should not be questioned on this.

  6. mary2tony says:
    July 31st, 2009 at 12:08 am

    Poverty doesn’t excuse corruption and oppression(internal colonialism). Greed for power cannot be blamed on external colonisers. Political philosophies or religious philosophies are not going to help oppressed ethnic minorities in some countries like Sri Lanka for a very long time to come – many countries are human rights violators and they are going to gang up together at any international organisation.

  7. justice4peace says:
    August 4th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    ”…the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, just and honest government …”

    3 years ago to this day, 17 aid workers(16 Tamils and 1 Muslim) were massacred in Eastern Sri Lanka. Yet the Sri lankan government is dragging its feet on an honest inquiry:

    Sri Lanka: Adopt International Inquiry for Aid Worker Killings – Human Rights Watch, 3 August 2009.

  8. ShaunBOL says:
    September 27th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    i had never even heard of the harare declaration until i came on this site.

Leave a Reply

terms and conditions

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up