Is the Commonwealth an English speaking union?
Posted by AlexT - 07/12/09 at 11:12 amMartin Mulloy is the English-Speaking Union’s Director of Education. The English-Speaking Union is an international charity founded in 1918 to promote international understanding and friendship through the use of the English language.
Transcript:
The English-Speaking Union promotes international understanding through the use of the English language. As we know, one of the unifying aspects of the Commonwealth is this common use of English. In practical terms, how does this use of English unite people from very different Commonwealth countries?
Well, I always think of English now as not so much a language; in fact, there’s a famous quote from a Foreign Minister in Germany who said that English isn’t a language as Portuguese, Greek or Spanish indeed is a language, English has become something more, it is the lingua franca for operating all across the world, and I think it’s just a tremendous vehicle to allow people from diverse cultures and countries to be able to speak to each other.
Newly-admitted to the Commonwealth is Rwanda, as of last week, following in the footsteps of Mozambique, which speaks Portuguese. Do you think this dilutes something essential to the Commonwealth?
No, the very opposite. I have referred to English as a means of communication, and we do know nowadays that a great deal of English is spoken by countries and people for whom English is not a first language, because of its power as a lingua franca. But there is another aspect; I think that perhaps countries like Rwanda, and indeed Mozambique, and I understand there are other non English-speaking countries possibly joining in the future, and I think they join the Commonwealth for a range of reasons, and one of them may be that perhaps countries are like people; they want to belong to communities, and communities which perhaps reflect a set of interests that they feel is important. So, Rwanda joining the Commonwealth is something I see as something positive. The bigger the embrace, the more common the interests, the better. I see this as a positive move.
Finally, a recent British Council study has found that less and less Indians are speaking English- obviously the largest and most populous country in the Commonwealth- and, in fact, there are more English-speakers in China than there are in India. With a rising India, and a rising China, is the use of English really still that important?
I think it most certainly is. The key issue here is the aspect of English as a lingua franca. A Chinese businessman speaking to, perhaps, a Brazilian businessman will be speaking English, more than likely, as the common language of communication. I’ll come back to India in a second. You mentioned China; China is also promoting the use of Mandarin, it has launched, I believe, ‘Confucius Centres’ throughout the world to promote the use of Mandarin. But it takes many, many years for this to happen; I mean English has had several centuries, for a whole host of reasons- political, imperial, business and media, web communications now- to gain an ascendancy. It will take an equivalent for perhaps Mandarin to have that same sort of currency in the world. The same could apply to India, and Indian languages. I understand that there are periods when a country wants to promote its own national identity and culture, and perhaps views English as eroding that. But, equally, English is a part of India, it is an official language, and the question is not how Indians will communicate internally, within India, but how they will communicate externally, with the world at large. English exists as a global entity, as I said at the beginning of this, it’s almost more than a language, in its role. So I don’t see this as a bad thing or a good thing, simply as a natural cycle.


December 7th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
As a native English speaker, I would prefer Esperanto as the future global language
Communciation should be for everyone, not just for an educational or political elite; that is how English is used at the moment.
Your readers may be interested in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2LPVcsL2k0 Dr Kvasnak teaches English at Florida Atlantic University.
A glimpse of Esperanto can be seen at http://www.lernu.net
December 18th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
English truly is one way in which the world has managed to communicate.Taking the Commonwealth to be an English empire or so might be a wrong a misleading assumption.The coming in of Mozambique and Rwanda which are non-English speaking is clear testimony.
It has been widely used and that should not confuse people as to say every member of the Commonwealth should be English or then try to learn English.
December 18th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
The English language is a very common international language. It does make things easy in the Commonwealth. But we can by no means let anyother regional languages die-out.
December 18th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
Canada is not an ‘English Speaking country. It is officially bilingual, English & French. The Quebecois were British Subjects and are not Canadian citizens just like Anglo-Canadians. They played a huge role in the British Empire, Confederation, and the Creation of the Commonwealth. Many were knighted and or received Victoria Crosses. Jean Chretien was recently honoured by the Queen. Unfortunately, that is often forgetten a facts twists by Sovereignists forces in Quebec. The role of the Quebecois in the Commonwealth should be highlighted and remembered in Canada and throughout the Commmonwealth. They were not second class British Subjects. They are not second class Canadian subjects of the Queen or membersof the Commownwealth. Many Anglo Canadians have French Canadian Ancestors. Many Quebecois have British blood — including Gilles Duceppe.
The First Nations of Canada and Aborigines of Australia are also part of the Commmonwealth. In Canada, at least, aboriginals have treaties directly with the Crown. The are not second class Commonwealth citizens, either.
The British Empire was unique in that it developed the notion that citizenship was not raced on ethniciity but on adherence to Common laws and civil society. All this garbage coming out about the Commonwealth representing the supremacy of an ethnic group is not historically correct.
December 18th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
That should be the “Quebecois are Canadian citizens.” Not does not belong.
December 18th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
The British Commonwealth is founded on certain principles. One is a common language.
English is the only world language. It is the native language of the country that created the industrialised democratic modern world.
Chinese or Hindi will always be spoken only in one or two countries. And as they aren’t the languages of trade, commerce, science, culture, or diplomacy that will never change.
Those who say we need to learn Arabic to trade with the Middle East, or Mandarin to break into China, are missing the point. We already speak the world lingua franca. The rest of the world are trying to catch up. Why waste that advantage, and try to learn a minority language?
December 18th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
We should share the most widespread, most extensive language in the world with the ROW like the new member Rwanda and be proud of that.
September 26th, 2011 at 11:02 am
Some interpretive blog